Brand profiles

Browse responsible sourcing programs by industry, not just by brand name.

Compare how major brands structure supplier expectations, what they show publicly, and what matters most in practice.

Browse by industry

Compare brands by sector, search when you already know the company or concern, and open the full profile once something looks relevant.

Industries: 4Profiles: 16

Apparel & footwear

5 profiles

Retailer codes, social audits, worker voice, migrant labor, and zero-tolerance handling.

Apparel & Footwear

Nike

Beaverton, United States

Responsible sourcing hub · Supplier code of conduct · Code leadership standards

Nike publishes a responsible sourcing framework built around a responsible supply chain hub, a supplier code, detailed Code Leadership Standards [Nike, 2025], and forced labor disclosure. The program is notable for translating broad labor, health and safety, and management-system expectations into operational supplier standards rather than leaving them at policy level.

Nike relies on a layered standards model rather than a single short supplier code.

Apparel

H&M Group

Stockholm, Sweden

Sustainability Commitment · Due diligence disclosure · Sustainable Impact Partnership Programme

H&M Group structures responsible sourcing around a public Sustainability Commitment [H&M, 2022 revision], dedicated due diligence framing, and a Sustainable Impact Partnership Programme. The brand's public materials show a program designed around business partner expectations, continuous engagement, and a formal human-rights due-diligence narrative.

H&M Group communicates supplier expectations through a business partner commitment, not just a narrow audit standard.

Apparel

VF Corporation

Denver, Colorado

Traceability framework · Global compliance principles · Supplier visibility

VF links supplier compliance principles with a public traceability framework to make sourcing expectations more explicit across product lines. Note: VF's traceability data was last updated in December 2021 [VF, 2021], so the current operational status of this tool should be verified independently.

Traceability is treated as a control with risk impact, not just a public narrative line item.

Apparel

Patagonia

Ventura, United States

Our Footprint hub · Fair Labor Association page · Living wage page

Patagonia frames supply chain responsibility through its public footprint pages, Fair Labor Association membership materials, living wage work, and environmental responsibility disclosures. The program stands out for being unusually transparent about the broader footprint and systems context around sourcing decisions.

Patagonia uses footprint storytelling to explain sourcing systems, not only to market products.

Apparel

Gap Inc.

San Francisco, United States

Impact hub · Human rights and labor issues page · Impact report

Gap Inc. frames responsible sourcing through its broader Impact hub, human rights and labor issue disclosures, and recurring impact reporting. The public structure suggests a program that combines policy/disclosure framing with regular reporting rather than relying on a single supplier-standards page to carry the whole story.

Gap Inc. uses its impact reporting architecture to explain human-rights and labor priorities.